Deleting Content Using the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988

This is the Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. This was signed in Berne, Switzerland and is the reason for the namesake.  Signing took place on September 9, 1886, and all acts, protocols, and revisions thereto are not self-executing under the Constitution and laws of the United States. (source)

Here is some additional information on the act:

(A) in the definition of “Pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works” by striking out in the first sentence “technical drawings, diagrams, and models” and inserting in lieu thereof “diagrams, models, and technical drawings, including architectural plans”;

(B) by inserting after the definition of “Audiovisual works”, the following: “The ‘Berne Convention’ is the Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, signed at Berne, Switzerland, on September 8, 1886, and all acts, protocols, and revisions thereto.

      “A work is a ‘Berne Convention work’ if–

“(1) in the case of an unpublished work, one or more of the authors is a national of a nation adhering to the Berne Convention, or in the case of a published work, one or more of the authors is a national of a nation adhering to the Berne Convention on the date of first publication;

“(2) the work was first published in a nation adhering to the Berne Convention, or was simultaneously first published in a nation adhering to the Berne Convention and in a foreign nation that does not adhere to the Berne Convention;

“(3) in the case of an audiovisual work–

        “(A) if one or more of the authors is a legal entity, that the author has its headquarters in a nation adhering to the Berne Convention; or

“(B) if one or more of the authors is an individual, that author is domiciled, or has his or her habitual residence in, a nation adhering to the Berne Convention; or

Why the Berne Convention De-indexing and Copyright Action Does Not Work

Has a reputation defender offered to remove or delete content from Google for you? Have they cited that they are using a law that was enacted back in 1988 called the Berne Convention Implementation Act? If so then please call us right away as there may be some issues associated with approach that do not comply with local, state, and national laws.

In addition a webpage that may be removed may be re-instated if you do not follow the proper protocol and Googles Terms of Service. You might have something bad online now but with the profile defenders reputation management services you can regain your image with an approach that showcases all the great things you have done while minimizing a mistake or disgruntled customers experience.

Copyright Infrigement Take Down Methods explained below:

 

Copyright infringement method
This method involves copyrighting your name, company name or other aspects of your business that is mentioned in the Ripoff report.
You then legally own that phrase, name, description etc…..
This is under the U.S. Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 that the USA and 179 other countries signed up for. This is the international law on copyright.
Once we have the certificates of copyright we make the petition along with a letter written in jurisprudence (Legal Language).
We are not accusing them or threatening them with legal action, we are simply informing them that Ripoff Report are using your copyrighted name, company name etc… WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION and that you are requesting that they (Google, Yahoo and Bing) respect the law and remove the listings because of “Copyright Infringement based on the US Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988”.
Google is very strict when it comes to copyright infringement.
They take a very dim view of someone using logos, phrases and brand names that belong to other companies without their permission.
They will take this seriously and many times will comply. The listings will vanish.
This usually this takes two months to achieve.
0
Contact Us
X